Bill Clinton vs. Fox News

If it looks like a fork and it quacks like a fork...

Moderator: aquaphase

User avatar
Rebecca
Posts: 495
Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2005 12:39 am
Location: SA

Bill Clinton vs. Fox News

Postby Rebecca » Wed Sep 27, 2006 8:02 pm

Has anyone seen this video of Bill Clinton laying into a Fox News interviewer? I heard that Fox had it removed from youtube.

Re "I miss Bill" becca

monet2u
Posts: 3072
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 8:07 am
Location: JoshLand

Postby monet2u » Wed Sep 27, 2006 8:21 pm

nope, but I'm gonna watch it when I get home tonight....

fox news sucks...I mean can you say... "censorship" :roll:

User avatar
Irock
Posts: 3248
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 3:28 pm
Contact:

Postby Irock » Wed Sep 27, 2006 9:32 pm

I saw a cartoon strip yesterday that mentions the same ABC documentary he mentions (the same one MoveOn tried to get pulled from the air). The cartoon strip asserted that "powerful democrats" got ABC to change the documentary to make the Clinton Administration look better.

My first thought was, "I saw that documentary, it blamed Clinton entirely for 9-11."

My second thought was, "What powerful democrats?"

It's like two halves of the country are operating with two completely different sets of facts. And I think Fox is largely responsible.

User avatar
Steveums
Mr. Leotard
Posts: 697
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 7:27 pm
Location: sleep
Contact:

Postby Steveums » Wed Sep 27, 2006 9:33 pm

fox news sucks...I mean can you say... "censorship" :roll:
not in this instance - it's the top video on their website. although quite why they want anyone to see it is beyond me. clinton doesn't beat about the bush (no pun intended) and infuriatingly avoid the crux of the question like most politicians are trained to do. over here, at least. i suppose the interviewer didn't really realise that an ex-president has a significantly different viewpoint over foreign policy decisions than the general public does.

still, the pathetic question should have been raised at some point, and now it's been answered.

User avatar
Dutch
Posts: 746
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 2:24 am

Postby Dutch » Wed Sep 27, 2006 9:59 pm

Yeah, I saw it. I thought it was very refreshing, though the mainstream media's response to it is as nauseating as it is typical, pulling a Dean and painting him as a raving madman foaming at the mouth. Even the Daily Show's coverage of it was somewhat lackluster, albeit comically accurate.

See it all here:

http://www.myspace.com/stfrancispan

User avatar
Sybil
Posts: 443
Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2005 12:44 am
Location: Denton, TX

Postby Sybil » Wed Sep 27, 2006 10:34 pm

clinton doesn't beat about the bush (no pun intended) and infuriatingly avoid the crux of the question like most politicians are trained to do. over here, at least. i suppose the interviewer didn't really realise that an ex-president has a significantly different viewpoint over foreign policy decisions than the general public.
Yes, it's so nice to see a politician who has command of both the facts and syntax. :lol:

Sybil


User avatar
sam
The Don
Posts: 1875
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 3:02 pm
Location: Dallas
Contact:

Postby sam » Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:33 pm

There was no doubt from any side that, going into his first term, Bush Jr. was going to stay as far away from foreign policy as possible because Clinton had been so much better at it than he could be and his "core" doesn't really like foreigners anyway.

That one didn't work out.


Return to “Slapdash Incongruities”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests